A number of public well being consultants have expressed considerations that the withdrawal of america from the World Well being Group (WHO) may have a big affect on Nigeria and world well being as American funding, shaping well being insurance policies, and responding to world well being crises are of important significance.
It was famous that the WHO withdrawing help would have vital penalties for Nigeria, because the nation depends closely on WHO help to help its public well being efforts, illness management efforts, and entry to important healthcare.
Donald Trump, the newly inaugurated president of the US, introduced on Monday that he’s withdrawing the US from the worldwide well being physique, citing the WHO’s mishandling of the COVID-19 pandemic that arose out of Wuhan, China, and different world well being crises.
The WHO has expressed regrets over the withdrawal announcement by america of America and urged the nation to rethink the choice.
The BMJ, a journal, in its publication on Tuesday following the announcement, warned that the severing of ties between the world’s largest financial system and its foremost public well being physique represents a significant setback for well being diplomacy, scientific collaboration, and funding. The repercussions, it famous, will ripple throughout borders, together with Nigeria, and depart WHO weaker.
The worldwide well being physique depends closely on US funding, which contributes about 18 % of its finances. The company’s two-year finances for 2024-2025 was $6.8 billion. In that interval, the US financed 75 % of WHO’s programmes for HIV and different sexually transmitted ailments and over half of contributions to fight tuberculosis.
There are considerations {that a} withdrawal may result in a big monetary shortfall for the organisation, doubtlessly impacting its capability to fund well being programmes, reply to outbreaks, and supply help to low- and middle-income international locations like Nigeria, which could see a discount in WHO funding for numerous WHO-supported well being programmes, together with illness management efforts, vaccination campaigns, and well being system strengthening initiatives.
The WHO is likely one of the largest donor businesses and well being financiers in Nigeria.
As an example, the well being physique authorised $5.84 billion for Nigeria in 2020-2021 alone. In accordance with well being consultants, this potential decline in funding for a rustic that also commits a meagre proportion of its finances to well being may exacerbate well being challenges.
Adaobi Onyechi, a well being skilled , stated decreased funding may place extra pressure on an already stretched well being finances and improve illness burdens in areas the place WHO is intervening.
The WHO gives well being interventions in Nigeria to handle a spread of well being points, together with illness management, outbreak prevention, and psychological well being companies. The WHO additionally works to enhance well being techniques and human sources.
Learn Additionally:
Onyechi, nevertheless, stated the diminished funding additionally presents a possibility for Nigeria to ramp up home financing and discover different sources of income, which she famous wouldn’t solely enhance well being outcomes however increase the financial system.
The US withdrawal may disproportionately affect lower-income international locations that depend on WHO help for vaccines, in response to world well being consultants.
Nigeria is reliant on the WHO’s vaccine procurement and distribution programmes. Consequently, a discount within the WHO’s capability because of the US withdrawal may result in decreased entry to vaccines for Nigeria, doubtlessly exacerbating outbreaks of vaccine-preventable ailments.
As an example, knowledge from the WHO web site exhibits that the company performed a task in making certain COVID-19 vaccine fairness for Nigeria, primarily by way of its involvement within the COVAX facility and different supportive initiatives.
Well being Safety
There are considerations that the withdrawal may have an effect on international locations that depend on the WHO help for well being techniques strengthening, illness surveillance, and important well being companies, doubtlessly exacerbating well being inequities. The US contributes scientific experience and innovation to the WHO-led initiatives.
The WHO performs a key function in world well being safety, together with the surveillance of ailments and coordination throughout outbreaks and offering technical and scientific help.
Well being consultants warn that Nigeria might navigate a extra fragmented world well being panorama, searching for bilateral partnerships or help from different worldwide organisations. A fragmented response will increase the danger of uncontrolled illness outbreaks, threatening worldwide well being safety.
There are rising considerations that different international locations, equivalent to China, might step in to fill the void left by the US, doubtlessly reshaping the priorities and governance of world well being initiatives.
Illness, pandemic response and preparedness
Presently, the WHO performs a central function in coordinating responses to world well being emergencies. Specialists consider that the diminished funding for WHO may have an effect on the extent to which the worldwide physique gives help, which Nigeria and a number of other different international locations have relied on for many years.
Nigeria depends on the WHO for technical help in illness surveillance, outbreak detection, and response. The WHO suggestions additionally form native response as seen in COVID-19 and ongoing Mpox outbreaks. Consequently, consultants consider {that a} diminished WHO presence may result in a lower in Nigeria’s capability to detect and reply to outbreaks, doubtlessly placing the general public’s well being at better danger.
Affect on well being diplomacy
Public well being consultants consider that well being points typically transcend borders, and world cooperation is important for successfully managing well being challenges, noting {that a} US withdrawal may undermine worldwide collaboration, making it harder to coordinate efforts on ailments that require a unified world response.
The WHO’s management in world well being gives a platform for Nigeria to have interaction with different international locations, worldwide organisations, and donors. In accordance with consultants, the withdrawal may restrict Nigeria’s entry to worldwide partnerships and sources, making it more difficult to safe funding and technical help for its well being programmes.
