[GreenBiz publishes a range of perspectives on the transition to a clean economy. The views expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect the position of GreenBiz.]
After nearly a full yr in impact, compliance with the EU Taxonomy for sustainable actions continues to seek out its ft. As of January, company disclosures of eligible sustainable financial actions have been necessary.
Nevertheless, one persistent shortcoming stays with the shortage of constant and correct company reporting (detailed in an earlier GreenBiz article). Though reporting volumes have elevated, firm disclosure knowledge for EU Taxonomy eligibility and alignment standards stay elusive, in line with a Bloomberg evaluation, as proven within the chart.
One other key regulation below the EU Action Plan for Financing Sustainable Growth, which is closely related to the EU Taxonomy, is the Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation (SFDR). Whereas the EU Taxonomy appears to be like at how investments assist the atmosphere, SFDR calls for transparency into how investments may hurt the atmosphere.
The 2 rules particularly come collectively for fund stage reporting, which got here into pressure in January. With this mandate, if a fund identifies as Article 8, which implies it has environmental traits, or as Article 9, which means that it has a sustainable funding goal as outlined by SFDR, then it should report an entire host of metrics, together with EU Taxonomy alignment of company investments aggregated at fund stage.
The evident query that then arises is: How can funds precisely convey their sustainable nature leveraging the EU Taxonomy with out the mandatory spine of company disclosure? The quick reply is that they don’t seem to be.
The chart under reveals that the overwhelming majority of Article 8 and 9 funds state no intention to align with the EU Taxonomy in pre-contractual disclosures through the industry-adopted European ESG Template (EET). This can be a jarring contradiction: Having inexperienced funds with out taxonomy alignment is regarding because it may diminish investor belief within the true “greenness” of an Article 8 or 9 fund.
The French public authority, the Autorité des Marchés Financiers (AMF), additionally acknowledged this concern in a recent position paper. It proposes numerous minimal requirements for Article 8 and 9 funds to supply a extra significant reflection of their dedication to sustainability. These proposed requirements lean closely on the EU Taxonomy and invite minimal taxonomy alignment for Article 9 funds. Nonetheless, solely with improved company disclosures will funds be capable to confidently declare taxonomy alignment and bolster investor confidence.
Confidently step up your EU Taxonomy reporting with ‘equal data’
A possible answer to those reporting woes is utilizing estimates to fill the gaps. Nevertheless, there was a scarcity of formal steerage from European regulators on what constitutes a suitable estimate to find out the proportion of EU Taxonomy-aligned investments. Understandably, as a consequence, corporations have been nervous about lacking the regulatory mark and placing their reputations in danger by counting on the “flawed” kind of estimates.
This all modified towards the tip of 2022 when the European Supervisory Authorities (ESAs) revealed a Q&A clarifying the nebulous reference to the permitted use of “equal data,” reminiscent of estimates for EU Taxonomy alignment.
The ESAs outlined the three core ideas of equal data in regard to particular EU Taxonomy testing standards as follows:
- Equal data ought to solely apply to financial actions listed within the EU Taxonomy Delegated Acts.
- The evaluation of the substantial contribution ought to depend on precise data.
- Do No Important Hurt (DNSH) controversy-based approaches must be discouraged and thought of inadequate.
In easier phrases, this implies you’ll be able to leverage estimated EU Taxonomy knowledge when the estimates solely use company-reported knowledge inputs and are modeled to the regulation, relatively than estimates primarily based on different estimates.
This has been the philosophy behind Bloomberg’s EU Taxonomy estimated data model from the beginning. Solely utilizing estimates which are primarily based on company-reported knowledge factors encourages company ESG disclosure, which helps to mitigate greenwashing. Within the absence of this knowledge, nonetheless, monetary corporations threat utilizing insufficient estimates that will not precisely mirror firm conduct, additional exacerbating the greenwashing drawback.
Whereas constant company disclosures discover their stride, monetary corporations can nonetheless meet their January EU Taxonomy reporting necessities with the precise kind of estimates.