Tuesday, February 3, 2026
HomeBusinessUSAID Funded $697 Million to Boko Haram, Al-Qaeda,and Others 

USAID Funded $697 Million to Boko Haram, Al-Qaeda,and Others 

Published on

spot_img

US Congressman Scott Perry has raised severe allegations that US support cash is not directly supporting terrorist teams reminiscent of ISIS, Al-Qaeda, and Boko Haram. 

Representing Pennsylvania, Perry introduced up these considerations throughout a authorities session targeted on decreasing waste and fraud.

Key Factors from the Allegations:

Misuse of Support Funds:

Perry argues that $697 million meant for worldwide support is being misused to fund actions linked to terrorism. He claims this cash helps madrasas and terrorist coaching camps that promote extremist behaviour.

USAID Underneath Scrutiny

Perry’s foremost goal is the US Company for Worldwide Improvement (USAID), which he accuses of failing to correctly handle funds designated for constructing faculties and different instructional initiatives in Pakistan and Afghanistan.

He highlighted an occasion the place $136 million was supposed to construct 120 faculties in Pakistan, however there’s no proof that these faculties had been ever constructed.

Questionable Instructional Initiatives:

Perry is skeptical about USAID-funded instructional applications in areas the place ladies’s rights are closely restricted.

He questioned the logic of funding such initiatives when native situations and militant teams stop ladies from even taking part in public life.

Broader Issues and Reactions

Requires Tighter Oversight

These accusations have sparked a requirement for extra stringent oversight of USAID and its dealing with of funds. The purpose is to make sure that American taxpayer cash is used successfully and never diverted to dangerous functions.

Help from Notable Figures

Elon Musk, tasked with main efforts to streamline authorities effectivity, helps Perry’s claims. Musk has criticized USAID’s actions as counterproductive and dangerous, even claiming that the company has engaged in controversial actions.

Political Implications

These claims gas ongoing debates concerning the transparency and effectiveness of US overseas support. They elevate necessary questions on how support is monitored and problem the programs in place to forestall misuse.

Latest articles

More like this

Share via
Send this to a friend