Within the newest installment of our Privateness Protectors Highlight sequence, we’re excited to characteristic worldwide privateness legislation skilled Professor Daniel J. Solove!

Daniel J. Solove is the Eugene L. and Barbara A. Bernard Professor of Mental Property and Know-how Legislation at George Washington College Legislation College. He serves because the co-director of the GW Middle for Legislation & Know-how and directs the Privateness and Know-how Legislation Program. Past academia, he’s the founder, President, and CEO of TeachPrivacy, a company that gives privateness and information safety coaching for companies, faculties, healthcare establishments, and different organizations.

A number one authority on privateness legislation, Solove has authored quite a few books, together with On Privateness and Know-how (2025), Breached! (2022), Nothing to Cover (2011), Understanding Privateness (2008), The Way forward for Fame (2007), and The Digital Particular person (2004). He has additionally co-authored a number of extensively used textbooks on data privateness legislation with Paul M. Schwartz and has written a privacy-focused kids’s e book, The Eyemonger (2020). His scholarship has been printed in prime legislation journals, together with Harvard Legislation Evaluation, Yale Legislation Journal, Stanford Legislation Evaluation, and Columbia Legislation Evaluation, and his work has been cited extensively, together with in U.S. Supreme Court docket selections. He’s the #1 most cited authorized scholar born after 1970.

Solove has performed a key position in shaping privateness legislation and coverage, having testified earlier than Congress, contributed to amicus briefs in main privateness circumstances, and served as a advisor or skilled witness for high-profile litigation. He was a co-reporter for the American Legislation Institute’s Ideas of the Legislation, Knowledge Privateness and is a fellow on the Ponemon Institute and Yale Legislation College’s Info Society Mission. He additionally sits on advisory boards for privacy-focused organizations such because the Digital Frontier Basis (EFF) and the Way forward for Privateness Discussion board (FPF).

Along with his tutorial and coverage work, Solove is the founder and co-organizer of main privacy-focused conferences, together with the Privateness + Safety Discussion board, the Privateness Legislation Students Convention (PLSC), and the Increased Training Privateness Convention (HEPC). He has been extensively quoted in media shops equivalent to The New York Occasions, Washington Put up, Wall Avenue Journal, and CNN. With over one million followers, he’s acknowledged as a number one privateness thought chief on LinkedIn and shares insights by means of his Privateness+Safety Weblog.

A graduate of Yale Legislation College, Solove clerked for Judges Stanley Sporkin and Pamela Ann Rymer earlier than working at Arnold & Porter and serving as a Senior Coverage Advisor at Hogan Lovells LLP. Right this moment, he continues to show, write, and advocate for stronger privateness protections.

How Solove Turned Curious about Privateness

Solove’s path to privateness legislation started at Yale Legislation College in 1996, the place he took Professor Jack Balkin’s cyberspace-law course, the primary time the course had been taught. On the time, only a few internet-related authorized circumstances had been determined, however the topic intrigued him. His early engagement with the web within the mid-Nineties, initially as a device for monitoring down bodily books, performed a task in shaping his perspective. One of many first books he bought on-line was Alan Westin’s Privateness and Freedom (1967)—an early and influential textual content on privateness within the digital age.

After Balkin’s course, Solove supposed to concentrate on our on-line world legislation, integrating a humanities perspective into authorized and know-how scholarship. He was influenced by the work of Richard Weisberg and James Boyd White, in addition to Martha Nussbaum’s Poetic Justice (1995), which argued for the significance of literary creativeness in authorized reasoning. Nonetheless, as he started researching and writing about privateness, the sector proved far bigger and extra advanced than he had anticipated.

In 1997, as he was ending legislation faculty, Solove wrote his first legislation evaluate article on privateness. On the time, privateness was a vastly underexplored matter in authorized scholarship, and he initially thought he would write just a few items on the topic earlier than shifting on to different areas. As an alternative, he discovered himself happening a rabbit gap, realizing that privateness was a essential and evolving authorized problem that demanded deeper exploration. That realization set the stage for his career-long concentrate on privateness, legislation, and know-how.

Solove’s Definition of Privateness and Myths About Privateness

Daniel Solove argues that privateness is usually misunderstood, each by the general public and by lawmakers. As an alternative of treating privateness as a single idea, he sees it as a multifaceted difficulty that includes management over private data, the flexibility to restrict surveillance, the facility to appropriate inaccuracies, and the best to not be misrepresented or manipulated by data-driven selections.

One in all Solove’s key contributions is difficult the “secrecy paradigm”—the concept privateness solely issues if somebody has one thing to cover. In Nothing to Cover, he dismantles this argument, displaying that privateness is not only about secrecy but in addition about having management over how private data is collected, used, and shared. Even when somebody has nothing to cover, their private information can nonetheless be used to profile them, prohibit their alternatives, or make selections about them with out their information.

Solove additionally debunks the “privateness vs. safety” fable, which assumes that defending privateness should come on the expense of safety. He argues that privateness and safety usually are not opposing forces; relatively, good privateness protections typically improve safety. For instance, when organizations gather extreme quantities of private information, they improve safety dangers by creating extra alternatives for breaches and identification theft.

The Relationship Between Privateness and Knowledge Safety Cartoon

One other false impression Solove addresses is the “particular person accountability” fable—the assumption that privateness is just a matter of private selection. He critiques the concept individuals can absolutely shield themselves by adjusting their settings, studying privateness insurance policies, or opting out of monitoring. In actuality, most information assortment occurs behind the scenes, with out significant consent, and people have little potential to cease it. Because of this Solove believes privateness ought to be handled as a structural difficulty, requiring authorized protections relatively than inserting all of the burden on people.

The Digital Particular person: Know-how and Privateness within the Info Age (2004)

In his e book The Digital Particular person, Daniel Solove examines how the rise of computerized record-keeping and information assortment has remodeled privateness, making a world the place huge quantities of private data are repeatedly gathered, analyzed, and utilized by governments and companies. He introduces the idea of the digital file—an in depth and ever-growing assortment of information about people, compiled from transactions, on-line habits, and authorities data. In contrast to conventional surveillance, which requires energetic monitoring, digital dossiers develop passively, typically with out people realizing how a lot data is being amassed about them.

“Even when we’re not conscious of it, the usage of digital dossiers is shaping our lives. Corporations use digital dossiers to find out how they do enterprise with us; monetary establishments use them to find out whether or not to present us credit score; employers flip to them to look at our backgrounds when hiring; legislation enforcement officers draw on them to analyze us; and identification thieves faucet into them to commit fraud.” (web page 3)

One in all Solove’s central arguments is that current privateness legal guidelines fail to guard in opposition to the risks posed by digital dossiers. Privateness legislation has traditionally centered on direct intrusions, equivalent to authorities surveillance or wiretapping, nevertheless it doesn’t adequately deal with information aggregation and secondary use—the best way corporations and businesses gather data for one objective after which use it for one more. He warns that information assortment is now not about particular person transactions however about patterns, as organizations mine information to make predictions about individuals’s behaviors, dangers, and even their potential future actions.

Solove critiques the belief that folks voluntarily hand over their privateness once they have interaction in transactions or use on-line providers. In actuality, most people have little selection—they have to take part in trendy society, whether or not by utilizing monetary providers, social media, or on-line commerce, all of which contribute to their digital dossiers. Furthermore, these dossiers are sometimes invisible and uncorrectable—people don’t know what data is being saved, can’t simply problem inaccuracies, and haven’t any management over how their information is used.

One other main theme in The Digital Particular person is the Kafkaesque nature of contemporary data programs. Drawing on Franz Kafka’s The Trial, Solove argues that the best privateness dangers immediately don’t come from a dystopian Huge Brother-style authorities however from a bureaucratic, faceless system the place selections are made about people based mostly on secretive and infrequently inaccurate information. 

“The issue will not be merely a lack of management over private data, neither is there a diabolical motive or plan for domination as with Huge Brother. The issue is a bureaucratic course of that’s uncontrolled. These bureaucratic methods of utilizing our data have palpable results on our lives as a result of individuals use our dossiers to make necessary selections about us to which we aren’t all the time privy.” (web page 9)

To deal with these points, Solove advocates for a brand new authorized framework for privateness. He requires larger oversight of information assortment practices, stricter limitations on how organizations use private information, and stronger protections for people to entry and proper their data.

On the time of its publication in 2004, The Digital Particular person was a groundbreaking work. Most of the issues Solove recognized—opaque information dealer practices, lack of authorized protections, and the risks of uncontrolled information aggregation—have solely intensified.

Solove’s Taxonomy of Privateness

In his 2006 paper “A Taxonomy of Privateness“, Daniel Solove launched a novel framework for categorizing privateness issues, which has since been extensively cited in authorized scholarship, court docket rulings, and coverage discussions. He later expanded on this taxonomy in his 2008 e book Understanding Privateness, the place he offered a extra detailed evaluation of how privateness violations happen and why conventional authorized approaches typically fail to deal with them.

Solove’s taxonomy organizes privateness points into 4 foremost classes:

1. Info Assortment – Undesirable surveillance, information gathering, and different types of intrusive monitoring.
2. Info Processing – Knowledge aggregation, storage, and use which will result in profiling, discrimination, or secondary use.
3. Info Dissemination – Unauthorized information sharing, leaks, identification theft, and reputational hurt.
4. Invasions – Direct interferences with private autonomy, equivalent to intrusions into personal life or extreme authorities and company management.

In contrast to older privateness fashions that focus primarily on secrecy or private management, Solove’s strategy highlights the structural and systemic dangers posed by trendy information assortment. This taxonomy has offered policymakers and courts with a clearer technique to establish privateness harms and has formed discussions on information safety legal guidelines, privateness laws, and company compliance insurance policies.

TeachPrivacy: Privateness and Safety Coaching

As a part of his efforts to guard privateness, in 2010, Daniel Solove based TeachPrivacy, an organization devoted to offering partaking and efficient privateness and information safety coaching for organizations throughout numerous industries. TeachPrivacy presents computer-based coaching modules masking a variety of matters, together with CCPA, GDPR, HIPAA, FERPA, GLBA, TCPA, phishing, social engineering, and different essential privateness and cybersecurity points. The programs incorporate movies, quizzes, and interactive components to make sure workers perceive privateness and safety dangers and find out how to mitigate them.

What units TeachPrivacy aside is Solove’s hands-on strategy. In contrast to many coaching applications developed by basic tutorial designers, TeachPrivacy programs are crafted by a subject-matter skilled with a long time of expertise in privateness legislation. Solove personally oversees the creation of all coaching applications, leveraging his deep information of authorized frameworks, regulatory enforcement tendencies, and real-world privateness challenges. His relationships with privateness and safety professionals additionally assist refine the fabric to make sure it aligns with business finest practices.

TeachPrivacy has offered coaching for lots of of organizations, together with many Fortune 500 and Fortune 1000 corporations, in addition to authorities entities, hospitals, know-how companies, monetary establishments, and better training establishments. The corporate’s strategy goes past simply providing generic on-line programs—it really works carefully with shoppers to customise content material, present further sources, and design coaching applications that match their particular wants.

Solove’s philosophy on coaching is rooted in efficient instructing ideas: privateness consciousness ought to be partaking, memorable, and accessible. He emphasizes the usage of storytelling, real-world examples, and interactivity to make advanced privateness legal guidelines and safety practices comprehensible. In his personal phrases, “Individuals won’t be taught until they care. To make individuals care, a instructor have to be partaking and have real ardour for the topic.”

As a part of his coaching applications, Solove makes use of humor to make privateness and safety points extra partaking.

Via TeachPrivacy, he creates cartoons that spotlight widespread privateness pitfalls, regulatory challenges, and the absurdities of contemporary information assortment. These cartoons have been extensively shared in privateness and safety circles, providing a lighthearted but insightful tackle severe points.

Via TeachPrivacy, Solove has created one of the revered privateness and safety coaching platforms, equipping organizations with the information to higher shield delicate information and adjust to evolving privateness laws.

The Eyemonger (2020)

In The Eyemonger, Daniel Solove brings his experience in privateness legislation into kids’s literature, utilizing an imaginative and barely eerie story to introduce younger readers to the risks of surveillance and the worth of privateness.

The story follows a mysterious, eyeball-covered determine known as The Eyemonger, who arrives in a small metropolis and convinces its residents to let him take over their safety. Together with his many eyes and a military of floating eyeballs, he guarantees to stop all wrongdoing and ensure everybody will get alongside. The townspeople enthusiastically settle for his provide, however as his surveillance expands, the burden of fixed monitoring begins to stifle creativity and freedom.

It’s Griffin, a younger artist, who lastly refuses to conform, resisting the Eyemonger’s “nothing to cover, nothing to concern” philosophy. The Eyemonger, in flip, comes to know that fixed surveillance doesn’t create concord however as an alternative crushes inspiration and self-expression.

With rhyming textual content and vividly detailed illustrations, The Eyemonger is a thought-provoking and visually partaking story about privateness, consent, and the affect of surveillance on creativity. 

By presenting these advanced points in a storytelling format, Solove makes privateness relatable and comprehensible to a youthful viewers—an viewers that can inevitably develop up navigating an period of information assortment, social media, and on-line monitoring.

Breached! Why Knowledge Safety Legislation Fails and Easy methods to Enhance It by Daniel J. Solove & Woodrow Hartzog (2022)

In Breached!, Professors Solove and Woodrow Hartzog argue that present information safety legal guidelines are failing as a result of they focus an excessive amount of on breaches themselves relatively than the broader systemic points that make breaches inevitable. They emphasize that current authorized frameworks punish organizations after a breach has occurred however do little to stop breaches within the first place. The e book proposes a holistic strategy to information safety legislation that considers human habits, systemic failures, and the broader information ecosystem, relatively than simply focusing on corporations that have breaches.

The e book criticizes the reactive nature of legal guidelines, which prioritize breach notification and post-incident penalties relatively than proactive threat discount. The authors argue that designing safety round human habits, relatively than anticipating individuals to vary, is vital to bettering outcomes. They study real-world breaches, such because the Workplace of Personnel Administration (OPM) hack, to indicate how poor privateness practices make safety failures extra catastrophic, and that privateness and safety go hand-in-hand.

“Privateness is a key and underappreciated side of information safety. Lawmakers and business ought to break down the regulatory and organizational silos that preserve them aside and strengthen our privateness guidelines as one technique to improve information safety and mitigate breaches.” (web page 10)

To maneuver past the reactive strategy that dominates present information safety legislation, Solove and Hartzog suggest a brand new framework that prioritizes prevention, accountability, and human-centered safety design. They define 4 key areas the place the legislation should enhance:

1. Holding All Actors Accountable – As an alternative of focusing solely on breached corporations, safety laws also needs to place accountability on software program distributors and machine producers for the insecure programs they create. Many safety failures originate not from the breached firm itself however from poorly designed know-how and weak default safety settings.
2. Prioritizing Prevention Over Response – Legal guidelines ought to shift from post-breach penalties to proactive safety measures, equivalent to information minimization and privacy-by-design, to scale back breach affect earlier than it occurs.
3. Designing for People, Not Simply Methods – Safety frameworks ought to acknowledge that human error is inevitable and construct safeguards accordingly. As an alternative of counting on advanced passwords that customers typically neglect, for instance, multi-factor authentication and password managers provide stronger safety with much less threat.
4. Strengthening the Relationship Between Privateness and Safety – Privateness is usually handled as separate from safety, however Solove and Hartzog argue that stronger privateness protections cut back safety dangers. Legal guidelines ought to restrict extreme information retention, as giant datasets improve breach dangers and hurt people when uncovered.

By addressing these systemic failures, Breached! advocates for a elementary shift in information safety legislation, one which focuses on stopping breaches relatively than simply cleansing up the injury afterward.

Privateness Harms by Danielle Keats Citron and Daniel J. Solove (2022)

In “Privateness Harms“, Professors Solove and Danielle Keats Citron argue that privateness violations regularly go unaddressed as a result of courts and legal guidelines fail to acknowledge the total extent of hurt brought on by the misuse of private information. Courts typically dismiss privateness harms as intangible or speculative, requiring proof of direct monetary or bodily injury. Nonetheless, many privateness harms manifest as psychological misery, reputational injury, and lack of autonomy—types of hurt that the authorized system doesn’t constantly acknowledge. 

The authors additionally emphasize that privateness violations usually are not remoted incidents; relatively, they accumulate and create widespread societal penalties. Small, particular person harms equivalent to frustration, anxiousness, and inconvenience could seem insignificant in isolation, however when skilled at scale, they result in substantial collective hurt.

Solove and Citron spotlight how information brokers amass in depth private information from numerous sources with out people’ information or consent, making it tough for individuals to evaluate or problem how their data is getting used. Seemingly minor information factors—equivalent to location historical past or searching habits—are aggregated to type detailed profiles that allow discrimination, manipulation, and fraud. 

This sort of surveillance may also have a ‘chilling impact’. Because the authors state, “chilling results have an effect on particular person audio system and society at giant as they cut back the vary of viewpoints expressed and the character of expression that’s shared. Monitoring of communications could make individuals much less more likely to have interaction in sure conversations, categorical sure views, or share private data” (web page 62). 

The authors argue that the widespread dissemination of private data, which people can’t predict or management, constitutes a major societal hurt.

To deal with these challenges, Solove and Citron suggest reforms that might realign privateness enforcement with its supposed objectives. They advocate for recognizing psychological and reputational hurt as legally cognizable, holding information brokers accountable for the hurt brought on by their enterprise practices, and strengthening shopper rights over private information. Courts ought to broaden their definitions of hurt to incorporate emotional misery and lack of autonomy, whereas corporations cashing in on private information ought to be legally chargeable for stopping its misuse. The authors argue that privateness laws ought to shift from being reactive—addressing hurt solely after it happens—to proactive enforcement that forestalls violations earlier than they occur. With out such reforms, privateness legislation will proceed to fail at defending people and society from the rising harms of unchecked information exploitation.

Synthetic Intelligence and Privateness (2025)

In his latest article “Synthetic Intelligence and Privateness,” Professor Solove explores how AI impacts privateness, arguing that whereas AI introduces new challenges, it primarily amplifies current privateness issues relatively than creating solely new ones. He challenges the concept AI requires a totally totally different strategy to privateness regulation, as an alternative advocating for strengthening privateness legal guidelines to deal with the problems AI magnifies.

“AI alters the best way selections are made, facilitating predictions in regards to the future that may have an effect on individuals’s remedy and alternatives. These predictions elevate considerations about human company and equity.

AI can be utilized in non-predictive selections about individuals, remodeling how bias impacts selections. AI decision-making includes automation, and there are issues brought on by automated processes that the legislation has to this point struggled to deal with. AI additionally allows unprecedented information evaluation, which may enormously improve surveillance and identification. Privateness legislation has lengthy inadequately addressed the issues brought on by surveillance and identification. AI threatens to take these issues to new heights and add troublesome new dimensions.” (web page 18)  

One in all Solove’s details is that AI complicates privateness at two key levels—when it collects information (inputs) and when it generates new data (outputs). AI programs are sometimes educated on huge quantities of private information, gathered by means of strategies like internet scraping, surveillance, and information aggregation. Many individuals by no means understand their information is getting used this manner, making conventional privateness protections—like consent—largely ineffective. On the output aspect, AI doesn’t simply analyze current information; it creates new data, making predictions about individuals’s habits, preferences, and even their identities. These AI-generated insights can result in unfair profiling, discrimination, and automatic decision-making that impacts individuals’s lives with out their information or consent.

Regardless of AI’s rising position in society, privateness legal guidelines haven’t stored up. Solove critiques present laws for putting an excessive amount of accountability on people to guard their very own privateness. Legal guidelines that depend on discover and consent—the place customers comply with privateness insurance policies—are largely meaningless in an AI-driven world the place information is collected behind the scenes and utilized in methods individuals don’t anticipate. As an alternative of specializing in particular person accountability, Solove argues that privateness legal guidelines must take a extra structural strategy, holding corporations accountable for the way they gather and use private information.

Finally, Solove makes the case that AI isn’t introducing a brand-new privateness disaster—it’s simply making long-standing issues larger and extra pressing. He believes that stronger, well-enforced privateness legal guidelines would already deal with a lot of AI’s dangers—equivalent to mass information assortment, biased decision-making, and hidden surveillance. 

Privateness in Authoritarian Occasions (2025)

In one other latest article, “Privateness in Authoritarian Occasions,” Solove explores how privateness features as a elementary safeguard in opposition to authoritarian overreach. He argues that each authorities surveillance and the widespread information assortment practices of personal corporations—what Shoshana Zuboff termed surveillance capitalism—work in tandem to broaden authoritarian energy.

“Authoritarian governments search to regulate individuals by invading their personal lives. They envelop individuals in surveillance to make sure that persons are obedient. They ferret out dissenting regarded as attacked – with threats, ostracism, blacklisting, pretextual legislation enforcement, and outright legal penalties. They search to regulate individuals’s our bodies and minds. They use private information to govern, blackmail, apprehend, or punish individuals. Authoritarian energy is enormously enhanced in immediately’s period of pervasive surveillance and relentless information assortment.” (web page 4)

Solove outlines how trendy authoritarianism doesn’t essentially depend on extralegal pressure; as an alternative, it typically operates inside authorized frameworks, utilizing legal guidelines as instruments of repression. 

A serious authorized flaw, in accordance with Solove, is the third-party doctrine, which permits the federal government to entry private information saved by corporations with out a warrant. Because of this information collected by social media platforms, cellphone corporations, and on-line providers is available for presidency use.

“The Fourth Modification presents little to no safety for a lot of our private information within the digital age, largely because of the third-party doctrine.” (web page 4)

Moreover, Solove warns that corporations regularly adjust to authorities calls for for information, relatively than resisting them.

“When the federal government calls for entry to non-public information or the usage of company applied sciences, will corporations resist? Historical past suggests the reply is probably going no.” (web page 5)

He cites historic and trendy examples the place firms handed over huge quantities of information to authoritarian governments, highlighting this as a major hazard of unchecked company information assortment.

A key argument of the article is that privateness protections have to be considerably strengthened, not solely by reforming Fourth Modification jurisprudence but in addition by regulating the personal sector’s position in mass information assortment. Solove emphasizes that authorities surveillance and company surveillance are two sides of the identical coin, and tackling authoritarian privateness intrusions requires addressing each.

To fight these threats, Solove proposes complete regulatory reforms, together with:

• Overturning the Third-Occasion Doctrine, which at present permits governments to entry huge quantities of private information saved by corporations.
• Implementing information minimization legal guidelines to restrict the quantity of private information that corporations gather and retain.
• Strengthening authorized protections in opposition to dragnet surveillance, making certain that authorities monitoring is topic to stricter oversight.
• Holding personal corporations accountable for enabling authoritarian surveillance, whether or not by means of information gross sales, AI-driven profiling, or compliance with oppressive authorities calls for.

Solove warns that with out significant privateness protections, societies threat enabling authoritarianism not simply by means of state energy but in addition by means of company complicity. He argues {that a} authorized and regulatory framework robust sufficient to face up to authoritarian pressures have to be constructed proactively, relatively than in response to crises.

This text presents a compelling case for why privateness ought to be seen as a pillar of democratic resilience, relatively than merely a private choice. Solove contends that the erosion of privateness is not only a matter of particular person rights however a broader menace to civil liberties, free thought, and resistance in opposition to authoritarianism.

On Privateness and Know-how (2025)

Daniel Solove’s newest e book, On Privateness and Know-how, is a end result of his 25 years of interested by privateness. It brings collectively his insights into how privateness ought to be outlined, how know-how has remodeled it, and why current privateness legal guidelines have largely failed. Whereas the e book expands on lots of the themes from Solove’s earlier works, it brings them collectively in a complete means and additional develops his critique of structural flaws in privateness legislation and the position of know-how in shaping human habits.

One in all Solove’s most necessary arguments in On Privateness and Know-how is that privateness legal guidelines are failing as a result of they’re designed for compliance relatively than actual safety. Too typically, corporations strategy privateness as a guidelines—assembly minimal authorized necessities relatively than making moral selections about information assortment and utilization. Solove believes that privateness legislation ought to shift from inflexible, rule-based compliance fashions to extra adaptable, responsibility-driven approaches.

Legal guidelines mustn’t simply regulate what information will be collected, but in addition impose limits on how corporations can use and monetize private data.

Solove additionally notes what number of corporations don’t must pressure customers to share information; they design providers that make individuals wish to share. From social media to personalised promoting, persons are nudged towards revealing extra about themselves than they could in any other case select. Solove argues that privateness legislation should account for this behavioral affect, recognizing that information assortment will not be all the time actually voluntary.

One other key difficulty Solove tackles is the failure of privateness legal guidelines to maintain up with technological change. Many legal guidelines, just like the U.S. Digital Communications Privateness Act, had been written for a totally totally different period of know-how, making them ill-suited for immediately’s digital world. However even newer privateness legal guidelines typically battle as a result of they depend on outdated fashions of consent and particular person management, relatively than addressing systemic points in how organizations handle and exploit information. Solove highlights the Video Privateness Safety Act as a uncommon instance of versatile, forward-thinking privateness legislation—one designed to use broadly to rising applied sciences, relatively than being restricted to a particular business or platform.

Within the remaining pages of the e book, Solove displays on the way forward for privateness, acknowledging that whereas privateness will all the time be beneath menace, it’s not past saving. He pushes again in opposition to each privateness defeatism (the concept privateness is useless) and technological solutionism (the assumption that privateness might be solved by means of higher know-how). As an alternative, he sees privateness as an ongoing mission, requiring fixed effort, vigilance, and advocacy.

“Privateness isn’t but useless . . . nevertheless it isn’t safe. We will’t escape from the concern that privateness could also be dying, nor ought to we. As know-how evolves, privateness will all the time be at risk. We should consistently work to maintain it alive, like emergency room medical doctors desperately attempting to save lots of a essential affected person. We will by no means relaxation. Defending privateness is destined to be an ongoing mission, not an issue to be solved. Most of the challenges know-how poses for privateness weren’t created by know-how—these issues already existed. However know-how exacerbates and amplifies; it speeds issues up and makes issues larger. We should deal with the threats it now presents and we should preserve at it, with out permitting both concern or worship of know-how to get in the best way.” (web page 109)

Daniel Solove and Privateness Safety

Over the course of his profession, Daniel Solove has been an indispensable determine within the struggle for privateness. Via his extensively cited authorized scholarship, he has launched new methods of understanding privateness and offered paths ahead for courts, regulators, and policymakers to categorise, forestall, and deal with privateness violations extra successfully. 

As somebody who has devoted himself to privateness training, Solove has helped numerous professionals and companies strengthen their privateness and information safety practices. He has additionally prolonged his instructional efforts to most of the people, writing books that designate privateness points in ways in which resonate with a broad viewers—together with his kids’s e book, The Eyemonger.

Via his scholarship, coverage advocacy, and academic initiatives, Daniel Solove continues to form the best way privateness is known, how it’s threatened, why it have to be protected, and the way authorized and coverage frameworks should evolve to maintain tempo with rising threats. His contributions to privateness are invaluable.

At Optery, we’re enormously impressed by Professor Solove’s work and are comfortable to highlight him for his excellent contributions to privateness safety.

Be part of us in recognizing Daniel Solove’s necessary work. You’ll be able to try his publications right here: Publications – Daniel J. Solove and obtain weekly details about his coaching, writings, occasions, and sources by subscribing to his e-newsletter right here: Privateness E-newsletter by Daniel J. Solove | TeachPrivacy

You may as well comply with him right here:

• Professor Solove’s LinkedIn Influencer weblog
• Professor Solove’s Twitter Feed
• Professor Solove’s E-newsletter

Be part of a number of of Professor Solove’s LinkedIn Dialogue Teams right here:

• Privateness and Knowledge Safety
• HIPAA Privateness & Safety
• Training Privateness and Knowledge Safety

Keep tuned for extra options in our Privateness Protectors Highlight sequence and comply with Optery’s weblog for additional insights on safeguarding your private data.