Myanmar makes many headlines nowadays. Whereas a lot of the focus has been on the Rohingya subject, the nation can be heading in direction of an essential financial and livelihood disaster. Myanmar was as soon as known as “Asia’s rice bowl”, and that label caught for a lot of the twentieth century. Whereas the nation is eager to reclaim this title, it’s uncertain this ambition will probably be realised quickly.
On the centre of this looming livelihood disaster is giant dams. In September 2011, now six years in the past, Myanmar’s then-president Thein Sein shocked his countryfolk and worldwide observers by suspending the development of the Myitsone Dam challenge in northern Myanmar, the largest of seven dam projects to be constructed on the Irrawaddy River.
The challenge had, from its graduation in 2009, been extraordinarily unpopular within the nation due to its huge destructive impacts on livelihoods, disrupting fisheries and native agriculture.
Despite the fact that Myanmar’s political system was extraordinarily restrictive at the moment, a major campaign had emerged in opposition to it, led by native communities and NGOs.
The Myitsone Dam’s suspension is extensively thought of as the main symbol of Myanmar’s political change from autocracy to democracy.
After I carried out field research in Myanmar last year a Burmese environmental activist instructed me:
This was the primary time for the reason that 1962 Burmese coup d’état that the nation’s political management took public opinion under consideration
Initially, the Myitsone Dam challenge was alleged to be accomplished this 12 months. Though a choice on its destiny was alleged to be made final 12 months by Myanmar’s chief Aung San Suu Kyi, it stays suspended until today. Many concern, although, that development might resume quickly. The impacts on livelihoods could be devastating.
Myanmar Damocles tasks
The primary objective of the dams to be constructed on the Irrawaddy River is hydropower manufacturing. Myanmar’s hydropower potential stands at 108 GW – the most important potential of any nation in Southeast Asia. However solely 52% of households have entry to electrical energy.
The nation must harness its huge hydropower sources to vary this, notably since Myanmar’s renewable power potential past hydropower is relatively limited. As an example, Myanmar has 3,400 km2 of land with wind speeds better than six meters per second, the minimal wanted for contemporary wind generators. This equates to solely 0.5% of the country’s total area. Therefore, wind energy will be unable to fulfill Myanmar’s quickly rising power wants. Myanmar is creating renewable alternate options to generate power because it has solely modest fossil fuel potential.
The deliberate tasks on the Irrawaddy River have a mixed capability of greater than 15 GW. For these to be resettled by them, they’re so-called “Damocles projects”. This time period displays the fixed risk hanging over villagers within the communities that are near the dams: the concern of resettlement. Most of the (to be displaced) communities are Kachin, a Christian minority in Myanmar that has lived on these lands for a whole bunch of years already.
Such tasks create tangible destructive impacts on communities even when not applied. As an example, communities invest much less in houses and companies resulting from a concern of being resettled quickly, whereas stress ranges for resettlees are notably excessive. Advocacy work in opposition to a dam challenge may closely eat folks’s time and sources.
However the tasks’ social impacts exceed far past resettlees. Almost 40 million people reside within the Irrawaddy River Basin. This equates to two-thirds of Myanmar’s whole inhabitants.
Many of those depend on fisheries for sustenance and/or a big a part of their meals. Nevertheless, giant dams act as limitations in a river system, blocking the motion of migratory fish species. So migratory fish downstream could be diminished by as a lot as 20% resulting from giant dam development, in response to some estimates, whereas measures to handle dams’ destructive impacts on fisheries equivalent to fish ladders can solely partially mitigate this impact.
Many level out that giant dams increase agricultural productiveness which may offset the destructive impacts on fisheries. Certainly, flooding could be regulated through dams which may enhance agricultural productiveness by a number of proportion factors, according to some studies.
Nevertheless, giant dams may block the stream of vitamins which, in flip, can reduce agricultural yield. Myanmar nonetheless is a predominantly agricultural financial system, with round two-thirds of the population employed in agriculture and virtually 40% of the nation’s gross home product (GDP) generated within the agricultural sector. Lowered agricultural productiveness would thus be devastating for the nation.
Battle zones
Myanmar’s finest potential hydropower websites are all in conflict areas.
Ethnic battle between the Kachin in northern Myanmar and the Burmese army -with the Kachin demanding extra self-determination from the nationwide authorities for the reason that early 1960 already – was reportedly exacerbated in 2010 as soon as work on the Myitsone Dam had began.
The Kachin and the Burmese army then clashed in 2011 ending a 17-year ceasefire agreement. Some international observers have attributed this to the Myitsone Dam development.
Such conflicts can additional threaten meals safety since they displace 1000’s of people that then wrestle to rebuild their livelihoods. Whereas worldwide consideration is targeted on Myanmar’s evolving Rakhine state disaster with the Rohingya, a much less seen army battle can be waging in northern Kachin state.
Air strikes by the Burmese authorities have steadily intensified since 2016 as a result of the Burmese authorities desires to get rid of the Kachin resistance in an effort to unite Myanmar. Kachin State has not witnessed such a violent armed fight for a minimum of 20 years. Any dam constructed in Kachin State nowadays – which might be an initiative led by the nationwide authorities – would additional gasoline this battle. It’s been estimated this ongoing battle has led to the displacement of 100,000 civilians.
Impacts of dams
Massive dams may have profound impacts on livelihoods of these dwelling within the Irrawaddy River Basin.
Therefore, harnessing Myanmar’s hydropower sources would require cautious managing of trade-offs by policy-makers – which incorporates thorough assessments of possible impacts and the creation of different livelihoods for these negatively affected by giant dams. Myanmar has many rules in place already – most notably its Environmental Influence Evaluation Procedures, adopted in early 2016 – to take care of these trade-offs.
These are (largely) sound on paper. Nevertheless, few of them are applied and till at the moment little info is shared by the federal government concerning dam improvement in Myanmar. If the nation’s political management desires to realize sustainable improvement for Myanmar, this might want to change instantly.