Ceremony Meals Restricted has as soon as once more resorted to authorized motion—this time concentrating on Mamuda Drinks Nigeria Restricted over its Pop Energy Power Drink, alleging trademark infringement and imitation. This follows a well-recognized sample: in 2021, Ceremony Meals filed an identical go well with towards NBC’s Predator Power Drink, which the Federal Excessive Court docket dismissed as baseless.
Such repeated lawsuits recommend a method of authorized intimidation fairly than honest market competitors. Business observers be aware that Ceremony Meals seems threatened by rising competitors and continues to make use of litigation to disrupt rising gamers.
Mamuda Drinks Nigeria Restricted, a proudly Nigerian firm based mostly in Kano, is broadly revered for its moral enterprise requirements and high-quality manufacturing. Its Pop Energy Power Drink has earned robust client reward for its energizing impact, engaging branding, and affordability.
Earlier, each firms reached a mutual 4-point settlement settlement, not as an act of contrition by Mamuda, however as a good-faith decision. The agreed phrases included:
1. Cap Coloration (Any coloration could also be used besides Yellow) – Present Cap “Olive Inexperienced”
2. Border strains (Any coloration could also be used besides Yellow) – Present border strains “White”
3. Description (Any phrase could also be used besides Basic) Present description “Unique”

4. Bottle coloration (Any coloration could also be used besides Black or Grey) Present bottle coloration “Olive Inexperienced”
Mamuda Drinks totally complied with the settlement, and packaging evaluations affirm these circumstances had been met. Regardless of this, Ceremony Meals resumed authorized assaults, although clear variations exist between the 2 bottles in design and construction
“Mamuda Drinks won’t be bullied,” an organization spokesperson acknowledged. “Pop Energy stands by itself advantage, and Nigerian shoppers acknowledge that.”
Mamuda Drinks Nigeria Restricted has full confidence within the Nigerian judicial system and trusts that the rule of legislation will prevail—affirming its rights and defending honest competitors.
This case raises a broader query: Ought to established manufacturers be allowed to suppress competitors? Or ought to innovation, client selection, and moral entrepreneurship be inspired?
Mamuda Drinks Nigeria Restricted deserves respect—not harassment—for its skilled conduct and contributions to Nigeria’s manufacturing sector.

