INEC, Tinubu, APC Opposes Atiku’s reside broadcast utility

INEC, Tinubu, APC Opposes Atiku’s reside broadcast utility

The appliance by the Peoples Democratic Get together and its presidential candidate, Atiku Abubakar, to permit for the reside televising of the continued election petition proceedings has been heard by the Presidential Election Petition Court docket on Thursday.

Events to the petition adopted their processes and agreed that paperwork licensed by the Unbiased Electoral Fee will likely be tendered with out objections.

Chris Uche, SAN, the counsel to the PDP and Atiku had urged the courtroom to grant an order which might permit the reside broadcast of the continuing because of the significance of the case.

Within the petition, the petitioners argued that Nigerians being stakeholders have a proper to have real-time details about the election petition proceedings.

All of the respondents to the petition title which incorporates INEC, the president-elect, Bola Tinubu, and the All Progressives Congress vehemently opposed the appliance.

Additionally, they contended that the courtroom will not be a circus, a movie home or a theatre however for critical and solemn enterprise.

Lateef Fagbemi, counsel for APC, requested the courtroom to not concede the request to show the courtroom right into a Massive Brother electoral sequence.

Nonetheless, the courtroom stood down for 5 minutes after listening to arguments from all events.

Recall that on Wednesday, Tinubu, and the Vice President-elect, Kashim Shettima, urged the courtroom to dismiss the appliance by Atiku and PDP for a reside broadcast of proceedings.

They argued that the reduction sought by the candidates will not be such that the courtroom might grant it.

The appliance additionally touches on the powers and jurisdiction invested within the President of the Court docket of Enchantment by the Structure, over which this honourable courtroom as presently constituted can not entertain. 

Additionally, they argued that the appliance is tailor-made in the direction of dissipating the valuable judicial time of the courtroom noting that the stated utility doesn’t have any bearing with the petition filed by the petitioners earlier than the courtroom.

“It’s within the curiosity of justice for this honourable courtroom to dismiss the stated utility filed by the petitioners,” they stated.

Read More

Read Previous

I Do Not Need to Expose Peter Obi – LP Factional Chairman, Apapa

Read Next

Durosinmi’s priceless impression: Viktoria Plzen make investments large to retain gifted Nigerian teenager

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *