Afrigather 
An aggrieved ‘sidechick’, Deborah Seyram Adablah, has dragged her ‘sugar daddy’ to court docket out of claims of damaged guarantees.
In line with the girl, she needs the court docket to power her former ‘boyfriend’ to fulfil his guarantees to her – that’s to purchase her a automotive, lease a spot for her and pay her month-to-month allowances.
Excerpts from the writ of summons filed by the girl’s legal professionals on the High Court in Accra have popped up on-line.
In line with Deborah, she began a relationship together with her sugar daddy while present process her nationwide service.
He rented a spot for her in Labadi, gave her a automotive and was paying her a month-to-month stipend of Ghc 3,000.
She mentioned he satisfied her to not take up an employment alternative after her nationwide service ended on the promise of securing capital for her to begin a enterprise.
He additionally promised her a ‘ring’ as soon as he divorced his spouse, whom he was having points with.
READ ALSO: Village Girl Abena Moet Rocks Nkoko Perming Looking Rough And Sticky
Deborah was having fun with all these goodies till she run into some issues together with her sugar daddy and all of the goodies stopped coming.
Her swimsuit begs the court docket to power him to fulfil his guarantees – ie give her again the automotive he purchased for her, pay the rest of her lease, pay her again pay for her allowance and in addition give her the capital promised to begin a enterprise.
This is perhaps the primary time in Ghanaian historical past a court docket must adjudicate whether or not guarantees made within the bed room are legally binding!
Take a look at extra particulars of the swimsuit under…
Assertion of Declare
- Plaintiff is an unemployed girl residing at Labadi, Accra.
- 1st Defendant is a director of finance working with the 2nd Defendant financial institution’s Head Workplace in Accra.
- 2nd Defendant is a financial institution and or monetary establishment registered below the legal guidelines of the Republic of Ghana with its registered workplace in Accra and is the employer of the first Defendant, and in addition the place the plaintiff labored as a Nationwide Service personnel till her exit from the financial institution.
- Plaintiff avers that, between her and the twond Defendant, she labored with the twond Defendant financial institution as a Nationwide Service personnel and the 1st Defendant was her superior because the Chief Finance Officer (CFO) on the 2nd Defendant financial institution.
- Plaintiff avers that in or about 10/10/2020, she was posted to the twond Defendant financial institution Head Workplace to do her Nationwide Service the place the 1st Defendant labored because the Head of Finance division designated because the Chief Finance Officer (CFO).
- Plaintiff avers that in her nationwide service work, she and the 1st Defendant entered right into a Parlor relationship. Plaintiff avers that, the connection began on account of a persistent sexual harassment and abuse by the 1st Defendant, a superior officer who wielded numerous energy which the plaintiff lastly gave in with out which she would have discovered working within the 2nd Defendant workplace a nightmare.
- Plaintiff avers that, when she began working with the twond Defendant financial institution, she noticed persistent sexual harassment by senior male officers towards feminine staff of the financial institution and when you failed to present in to their calls for, your life within the financial institution is made sad, uncomfortable and unfriendly to work in. Plaintiff avers that, just about each senior supervisor has a girlfriend within the financial institution and so they change the women at their will to the information of the managers of the twond Defendant financial institution. Additionally they use we the feminine workers to make advances to very wealthy prospects with a view to sleeping with them and getting them to open accounts with the financial institution to the detriments of the feminine staffs.
- Plaintiff avers that, it’s towards this background of persistent sexual harassment and abuse by the 15 Defendant on the plaintiff, whereas the twond Defendant appeared on with out taking measures to eradicate identical however inspired identical by her acts of omission that plaintiff had no various than to fall prey within the palms of the 1st Defendant and gave in to a Parlor relationship with the 1st Defendant. Plaintiff avers that, the twond Defendant as her employer owed her an obligation of care which 2nd Defendant failed her, and worst nonetheless, 2nd Defendant additionally pushed her to achieve out to male prospects to bait them with intercourse in trade of opening accounts with the financial institution.
- Plaintiff avers that, her Parlor relationship was open and identified to nearly all the employees within the 2nd Defendant financial institution and to the twond Defendant. Not solely was the twond Defendant conscious the plaintiff engaged on this unholy and unhealthy work relationship, it was the order of the day within the 2nd Defendant financial institution which the twond Defendant appeared on with out defending his/her feminine staff and on this case the Plaintiff.
- Plaintiff avers that, on the time she got here in as a Nationwide Service personnel, there was a feminine married girl employee who was additionally harassed and gave in, and it was an open secret within the financial institution identified by all the employees and nobody can query identical because you stand to lose your job with the twond Defendant financial institution.
- Plaintiff avers that, no worker is ready to testify to this impact since all of them worry dropping their jobs, and it is a single battle the plaintiff undertakes to combat with the hope that many feminine staff can be liberated from their bondage.
Plaintiff avers that, in any respect materials instances, the 2nd Defendant owed an obligation of care to its workers particularly feminine workers who have been perpetually sexually harassed and abused within the office to the information of the 2nd Defendant who appeared on and inspired identical since all the highest executives have been concerned on this intercourse matches, with the Plaintiff’s personal with the first defendant.
2nd defendant below the Labour Act of Ghana owed some duties in direction of her workers and the workers had rights which have been violated by the 2nd defendant.
- Plaintiff avers that she was not the one individual engaged to do Nationwide Service for the interval. She had different colleagues who have been additionally doing Nationwide Service about the identical time. Plaintiff avers that when the Nationwide Service was about to return to an finish, the Nationwide Service personnel and particularly the plaintiff and her colleagues have been about to be engaged as Contract Staff by the financial institution.
- Plaintiff avers that the 15 defendant having abused his place as Chief Finance officer (CFO) harassed Plaintiff into accepting a parlor relationship and succeeded in persuading Plaintiff to comply with exit the financial institution i.e. First Atlantic Financial institution despite the truth that she and her colleaques had a possibility to proceed as Contract Employees in order that they may proceed the parlor relationship at an attractive consideration.
- Plaintiff with all of the assurances from the first defendant to exit the financial institution and never take up a contract and in return for that 1st defendant made representations and assurances to the plaintiff to the impact that he’ll give the plaintiff the next:
- Lump sum working capital to begin enterprise.
- Pay for her lodging/Lease for 3 years
- Purchase her a automotive
- Pay her GH¢3,000.00 a month
- Purchase plaintiff a hoop
- Pay her medical and different Payments together with paying for her to bear a household planning therapy in order that she is not going to give start within the brief time period.
- To marry Plaintiff after divorcing his spouse in the midst of their parlor relationship since 1st Defendant’s relationship along with his spouse was challenged, with irreconcilable variations and the wedding had damaged down past repairs and or reconciliation.
Typically to care for the plaintiff.
- Plaintiff avers that on the power of those representations; when her colleagues have been engaged on Contract, she didn’t even apply to take up the Contract appointment and exited upon the top of her Nationwide Service in July 2021. Plaintiff additionally agreed to have interaction within the Parlor relationship with the 1St defendant pending marriage.
- Plaintiff avers that having undertaken and certainly and actually agreed to hold out her a part of the cut price as said in paragraph 14 and 15 herein, the 15 defendant additionally agreed to execute his a part of the cut price.
- Plaintiff avers that true to the 15 defendant’s representations and assurances, he offered the Plaintiff with a 2-bed room lodging at a rental worth of GH¢1,500 monthly and paid the first-year lease leaving an excellent 2 years lease of H/No.GL-010-0745 Labadi, Accra which the plaintiff remains to be occupying, on the time of problem of this Writ which is because of be renewed. Certainly, Plaintiff has now been taken to the lease management for ejection.
- Plaintiff avers that 1st defendant additionally began paying the Plaintiff a month-to-month stipend/allowance/ wage of GH¢3,000 monthly and has been paying identical till July 2022 when the events began having variations and the first Defendant is now in arrears of fee on the time of issuing this Writ.
- 1st Defendant additionally requested the Plaintiff to go and search for a automotive for herself in order that he can pay for it. Plaintiff due to this fact contacted a Automotive seller and obtained a automotive i.e. Honda Civic a house used and unregistered automotive. Plaintiff bargained for it at the price of GH¢120,000 which plaintiff referred the automotive seller to the first defendant who paid for the automotive, registered it and handed the keys over to the Plaintiff which she has been driving for slightly over a yr now.
- Plaintiff additional avers that the first Defendant to make sure that he monitored Plaintiff’s motion and to have a monopoly over her, put in a monitoring system i.e., a monitoring system in Plaintiff’s automotive and monitored plaintiff in every single place she went even when he’s in a foreign country he displays plaintiff from outdoors and might at his beck and name cease the automotive every time he needed.
- Plaintiff avers that, in furtherance of the first Defendant desirous to have sexual . intercourse together with her with out safety from 1st defendant, he put the plaintiff to a dangerous medical household planning therapy though, the events knew the danger entailed which she dropped at the eye of the 1s Defendant. 1st Defendant due to this fact paid for Plaintiff’s household planning therapy at Marie Stopes Clinic Kokomlemle, Accra and in addition paid for her medical payments every time she faces the impact of the Household Planning injection which made her to bleed excessively.
Lately Plaintiff was confronted with related extreme bleeding and contacted the 1st Defendant to finance the therapy which he ignored. Plaintiff has been having problems and has been visiting specialist at each Belief Hospital and 37 Navy Hospital for therapy.
- Plaintiff at very late-night hours on the directions of the first defendant needed to faux to be a secretary within the workplace referred to as Emefa every time the first Defendant’s spouse referred to as, all to substantiate to the plaintiff that, his marriage was certainly challenged.
To the extent that the spouse contacted the Plaintiff to substantiate story.
- Plaintiff avers that currently she began having issues with the first defendant over variations in the way in which they need to proceed with their relationship. 15 Defendant needed to have unnatural carnal information of the Plaintiff however plaintiff refused.
This continued severally and the events’ variations continued to widen.
- Plaintiff avers that there have been related requests from the first defendant of assorted nature which weren’t in conformity with societal norms. Plaintiff and the first defendant then met and determined to deliver an finish to their relationship.
- At one such assembly at Brasa Restaurant the events reached an Settlement for the first Defendant to compensate the Plaintiff. Once they reached their settlement on the assembly, Plaintiff fearing that this may occasionally in future be denied by both get together requested that they report on audio/video of the understanding or agreements reached. Plaintiff and 1st defendant despatched textual content messages to Plaintiff pointing to their understanding and is offered and can be tendered on the trial.
- Plaintiff avers that on one event, when 1st defendant was out of the Nation in Dubai, 1st Defendant used the monitoring system to forcefully cease the automotive whereas Plaintiff was driving on the highway, which was life threatening. Plaintiff promised to restore the automotive or be reimbursed by the first Defendant, however when plaintiff repaired the automotive and knowledgeable the first Defendant, he relatively went to the Mechanic and sprayers and confirmed them paperwork of the automotive exhibiting his title because the proprietor of the automotive. 1st Defendant insisted to select the automotive, however the mechanic, welder and the sprayer is not going to give him entry. Plaintiff avers that, in complete a sum of GH¢10,000.00 was paid to the Welder. GH¢500.00 was paid for Components purchased by the mechanic and his workmanship GH¢6500, the sprayer GH¢3,000.00 and so they have did not problem the Plaintiff receipt regardless of persistent request to take action.
- Plaintiff avers that it was solely at this level that she realized that the automotive was not in her title. Plaintiff avers that this stunned her. Plaintiff additionally instructed the Mechanics/Sprayers to make a report back to the Police which they did, however 1st Defendant has threatened them and they won’t need to have something to do with this case.
- Plaintiff avers that, she instructed her legal professionals to debate with the first defendant’s legal professionals however the 1st defendant was prepared to alter the papers of the automotive he bought for the Plaintiff into the Plaintiff’s and in addition pay a number of the medical payments however not all, therefore this motion.
- Plaintiff additionally went herself to make a report back to DOVVSU at Police headquarters however the police didn’t give her the mandatory help.
- Plaintiff then instructed her lawyer to take up the temporary and plaintiff’s lawyer wrote to the first Defendant to have the matter amicably resolved, however 1st Defendant failed, refused or uncared for to settle.
- Plaintiff avers that after 1st Defendant acquired the discover from her Lawyer, 1st Defendant lodged a Criticism of stealing the automotive at a Police station and was accompanied by the pinnacle of 2nd defendant’s safety referred to as […] and led the police staff to besiege her home, forcefully took the automotive and towed the automotive to the Higher Accra Regional Police Station on a working day. Plaintiff has footage and movies of the first Defendant and 2nd Defendant’s consultant (Daniel Afrifa) who led the police to invade Plaintiff’s residence, embarrassed her and put her in a perpetual shock decreasing her fame earlier than the right-thinking members of her group Labadi-Lamptey George.
- Plaintiff was stunned to know that she was being charged for stealing the automotive 1st defendant purchased for her throughout their relationship. Plaintiff wrote her Assertion and the police after going by means of the Assertion met each events which included the pinnacle of twond Defendant’s safety; who participated actively and at some extent challenged the crime officer who condemned the arrest by his officers along with the defendants. The police after listening to the events got here to a willpower that the defendants have misled them to behave since they thought that was not stealing and so they launched the automotive to the Plaintiff.
- Plaintiff avers that the police and the defendants embarrassed her at her home, her neighbours got here taking a look at her, the police within the course of assaulted the Plaintiff and identical was reported on the Labadi Police Station. The defendants did all these in dangerous religion and led the police to maliciously take steps to arrest and prosecute her for an offence defendants knew she didn’t commit.
- Plaintiff has since had a shock and this therapy has affected her for a while now and proceed to hang-out her in her life with fingers being pointed at her on account of the malicious conduct exhibited by the defendants.
- Plaintiff avers that, days after, the police launched her automotive to her. The first Defendant’s lawyer then replied to the Plaintiff lawyer’s letter denying the claims.
- Plaintiff aver that she has been used, abused, maltreated, exploited, deceived, disillusioned, failed and insulted by the acts of the defendants. Plaintiff additionally has severally been threatened by the first Defendant verbally and in addition despatched threatening textual content messages to Plaintiff placing her life in peril and this has been captured in Plaintiff’s Assertion to the Police.
- The conduct of the Defendants has injured the Plaintiff and lowered her fame and standing in her group and in addition the first Defendant has failed to hold by means of their understandings, preparations, guarantees and or settlement and until compelled by this honourable Court docket for the first Defendant to honor his a part of the cut price he’ll persist in his everlasting refusal.
- Wherefore, the Plaintiff claims collectively and severally towards the defendants as follows:
- a) An order that the first defendant transfers title of automotive No. GC-7899-21 into the title of the plaintiff and or an order directed at DVLA to Register the Automotive No.GC-7899-21 into the title of the Plaintiff because the proprietor.
- b) A refund of price of repairs of GH¢10,000.00 which 1st Defendant promised to refund to the plaintiff however failed.
- c) An order that the Defendants pay to the Plaintiff the next:
(i) 1st Defendant pays lump sum cash to the plaintiff to allow the plaintiff begin a enterprise to care for herself as agreed by the plaintiff and the first Defendant.
(ii) 1st Defendant pays the remaining two (2) years lease for Plaintiff’s lodging or to pay identical quantity for the remaining two (2) years on the identical charge at an alternate lodging.
(iii) 1st Defendant to pay the excellent arrears of Plaintiff’s month-to-month allowance from July 2022 to the date of Judgment and pay all medical bills on account of the unwanted side effects of the Household Planning therapy.
(iv) Normal damages towards the Defendants.
(d) Every other reliefs the Court docket deems needed together with authorized price
Supply: GhanaCelebrities.Com
READ ALSO: Refused A UK Visa? CLICK HERE FOR HELP
